Skip to main content

The price for not agreeing

Having opposing views than that of the government is quite dangerous in Iran. Let me take the example of the 2009 presidential election, after which several hundreds of people were arrested. Among them were prominent reformist politicians, human rights defenders, journalists and students.
www.aljazeera.com

But how did that happen?
In 2009 Iranian people were about to appoint their president for the next four years, after the controversial presidency of ultra-conservative Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. 

In the previous four years, the inflation had risen and the property values, especially in the capital, had increased sharply. Moreover, Mr Ahmadinejad focussed on Iran's nuclear program, which resulted in the United Nations’s sanctions on the Iranian government.

So in the election of 12 June 2009, three new candidates, running beside Mr Ahmadinejad, promised to change the current economic and social situation and bring reforms, namely:

 - Mir-Hossein Mousavi, a reformist politician and the strongest candidate against Ahmadinejad. He served as the last Prime Minister between 1981-89 and has won the backing of major politicians, such as former President, Mohammad Khatami.

- Mehdi Karroubi, another influential reformist politician, and the candidate of the National Trust Party. He was the chairman of the parliament between 1989-92 and 2000-04. He was an advocate of women's rights.

- Mohsen Rezai, the Conservative candidate. He previously headed Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guards and, in his presidential campaign, promised to fight poverty and unemployment.

Although the votes are counted by hand, the Interior Ministry, announced the first results within an hour of the polls closing. The official result came out less than a day later. These surprised many and the results themselves foreshadowed a level of distortion of the votes. 
Mr Ahmadinejad won by a landslide (62.6%), while the other candidates received far less support (Mousavi 33.8%, Rezai 1.7% and Karroubi 0.9%), according to official figures. The election featured high participation (85%). 

Even though the three opposition candidates rejected the results, claimed that the votes were manipulated and lodged official complaints, nothing happened, indeed, the Supreme Leader defended the election as legitimate and called Ahmadinejad’s victory a “divine assessment”. 

On the following days, supporters of the opposition candidates took to the street, claiming that the votes were rigged and demanding the dismissal of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad from office. They took green flags and dressed in that colour and were chanting the motto “Where is my vote?”. Day after day the protests widened, including uprisings outside Tehran and also outside Iran: in front of the Iranian embassies in Turkey, Paris, Berlin, London, Rome, Sydney etc. In spite of the government’s prohibition of any form of protests, peaceful gatherings were organised until early 2010 in Tehran and across the country.

In response to the outcry, the government arrested a large number of protesters and several were killed by the police and governmental militia forces. The regime significantly slowed down internet access and censored any form of media agreeing with the opposition. Media outsets and newspapers reported direct media censorship by the Iranian government, stating that “some of the newspapers have been given notices to change their editorials or their main headlines”.

After Ahmadinejad’s official inauguration, Mehdi Karroubi and Mir Hossein Mousavi continued to voice opposition to the government and to human rights violations by security forces. They set up a new coalition named "The Green Path of Hope” and started working in peaceful and legal methods to widen the influence of their reforms.
In February 2011 they sent an open letter to the Interior Ministry, requesting permission to hold a rally on 14 February “[i]n order to declare support for the popular movements in the region, in particular, the freedom-seeking movements of the people of Egypt and Tunisia…” But the authorities didn’t grant permission and responded by placing the leaders of the movement under house arrest. 

They are still being held under house arrest without an arrest warrant, charge or trial, along with Mir Hossein Mousavi’s wife Zahra Rahnavard. As their families revealed, they are deprived of access to books, newspapers, a telephone and radio.

Mr Rouhani has demanded that the national security council find a "final solution" to their continued arrest. Last month Iranian media suggested that Mr Rouhani might ask the public to vote on the fate of the two men. But the dossier on the three detainees has recently been transferred to the office of Iran's Supreme Leader, who has the last say on the issue.

Popular posts from this blog

Is it worth icing the "candyman"?

There is nothing new about the Islamic Republic ranking second for number of executions , after China. But the fact that the official number almost reached 300 (to be precise: 289) in 2014 is harsh.  It is also obvious that this number and the statistics shown in previous years are certainly below reality, since there are no publicly available data on capital punishment carried out in the country. Reliable sources informed Amnesty International that the figure might be even bigger than 740. According to some ethical principles, all, but only guilty people deserve to be punished, and of course, in proportion to the severity of their crime .  And what does the international law say about the death penalty? It calls on states to guarantee that “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life .”   The law also provides that “In countries which have not abolished the death ...

How should Cameroon fight Boko Haram?

The Cameroonian security forces don't take into account how many lives they sacrifice when it comes to eradicating the Islamist group, Boko Haram. Amnesty International revealed in its new report that t he military offensive against Boko Haram has resulted in widespread human rights violations against civilians in the Far North region of the country. During search-and-cordon operations, security forces  often arrest people on the basis of very little information or assumptions and sometimes they detain whole groups. In February 2015 for example,  in Kossa,  32 men were arrested based on accusations that the village was providing food to Boko Haram. Most were later released, but one man died in custody. After being arrested, people are far too often held incommunicado at illegal detention sites in military bases, before being transferred to the official prisons. And, as Amnesty International learnt, in secret detention, torture is not a rare method to encoura...

The ideology of Boko Haram and the Islamic State

Boko Haram had announced the group's pledge of allegiance to the Islamic State on 7 March 2015, therewith aligning itself with the IS in the global Jihadist movement. The IS welcomed the news and promptly accepted a pledge of allegiance to the group , according to an audiotape purportedly from its spokesman. "We announce to you to the good news of the expansion of the caliphate to West Africa because the caliph... has accepted the allegiance of our brothers [..]”  – IS spokesman Mohammed al-Adnani said in the message. However, this video appearing on IS-affiliated websites could not be authenticated. Although the nature of exact links between the two armed groups are still unclear, it can be confirmed that their ideologies and operations show similarities, despite some remaining differences. (Source: www.dw.com) The ideology of the two armed groups The ideology of both groups is based on a premodern theological tradition that wants the establishment o...