Skip to main content

The price for not agreeing

Having opposing views than that of the government is quite dangerous in Iran. Let me take the example of the 2009 presidential election, after which several hundreds of people were arrested. Among them were prominent reformist politicians, human rights defenders, journalists and students.
www.aljazeera.com

But how did that happen?
In 2009 Iranian people were about to appoint their president for the next four years, after the controversial presidency of ultra-conservative Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. 

In the previous four years, the inflation had risen and the property values, especially in the capital, had increased sharply. Moreover, Mr Ahmadinejad focussed on Iran's nuclear program, which resulted in the United Nations’s sanctions on the Iranian government.

So in the election of 12 June 2009, three new candidates, running beside Mr Ahmadinejad, promised to change the current economic and social situation and bring reforms, namely:

 - Mir-Hossein Mousavi, a reformist politician and the strongest candidate against Ahmadinejad. He served as the last Prime Minister between 1981-89 and has won the backing of major politicians, such as former President, Mohammad Khatami.

- Mehdi Karroubi, another influential reformist politician, and the candidate of the National Trust Party. He was the chairman of the parliament between 1989-92 and 2000-04. He was an advocate of women's rights.

- Mohsen Rezai, the Conservative candidate. He previously headed Iran's powerful Revolutionary Guards and, in his presidential campaign, promised to fight poverty and unemployment.

Although the votes are counted by hand, the Interior Ministry, announced the first results within an hour of the polls closing. The official result came out less than a day later. These surprised many and the results themselves foreshadowed a level of distortion of the votes. 
Mr Ahmadinejad won by a landslide (62.6%), while the other candidates received far less support (Mousavi 33.8%, Rezai 1.7% and Karroubi 0.9%), according to official figures. The election featured high participation (85%). 

Even though the three opposition candidates rejected the results, claimed that the votes were manipulated and lodged official complaints, nothing happened, indeed, the Supreme Leader defended the election as legitimate and called Ahmadinejad’s victory a “divine assessment”. 

On the following days, supporters of the opposition candidates took to the street, claiming that the votes were rigged and demanding the dismissal of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad from office. They took green flags and dressed in that colour and were chanting the motto “Where is my vote?”. Day after day the protests widened, including uprisings outside Tehran and also outside Iran: in front of the Iranian embassies in Turkey, Paris, Berlin, London, Rome, Sydney etc. In spite of the government’s prohibition of any form of protests, peaceful gatherings were organised until early 2010 in Tehran and across the country.

In response to the outcry, the government arrested a large number of protesters and several were killed by the police and governmental militia forces. The regime significantly slowed down internet access and censored any form of media agreeing with the opposition. Media outsets and newspapers reported direct media censorship by the Iranian government, stating that “some of the newspapers have been given notices to change their editorials or their main headlines”.

After Ahmadinejad’s official inauguration, Mehdi Karroubi and Mir Hossein Mousavi continued to voice opposition to the government and to human rights violations by security forces. They set up a new coalition named "The Green Path of Hope” and started working in peaceful and legal methods to widen the influence of their reforms.
In February 2011 they sent an open letter to the Interior Ministry, requesting permission to hold a rally on 14 February “[i]n order to declare support for the popular movements in the region, in particular, the freedom-seeking movements of the people of Egypt and Tunisia…” But the authorities didn’t grant permission and responded by placing the leaders of the movement under house arrest. 

They are still being held under house arrest without an arrest warrant, charge or trial, along with Mir Hossein Mousavi’s wife Zahra Rahnavard. As their families revealed, they are deprived of access to books, newspapers, a telephone and radio.

Mr Rouhani has demanded that the national security council find a "final solution" to their continued arrest. Last month Iranian media suggested that Mr Rouhani might ask the public to vote on the fate of the two men. But the dossier on the three detainees has recently been transferred to the office of Iran's Supreme Leader, who has the last say on the issue.

Popular posts from this blog

Updated version: Mohammad Ali Taheri ENDED his hunger strike says his family

Mohammad Ali Taheri, the founder of a new spiritual group Erfan-e Halgheh, was on hunger strike for about 70 days. He was protesting his death sentence for “spreading corruption on earth” through his spiritual beliefs and teachings. Furthermore, he has risen up against the Iranian authorities’ refusal to allow him access to his lawyers and to get a copy of the court verdict. On 21 October, his family confirmed that Taheri ended his hunger strike . (Source: amnesty.org ) Taheri he has not been able to meet his legal representative since 22 August, a few days after the lawyer submitted an appeal against the death sentence. While waiting for any information about the status of the appeal, Taheri’s physical health is deteriorating. He has lost weight and is suffering from low blood pressure. He was taken to the prison clinic for a few hours on 18 September after he lost consciousness. Mohammad Ali Taheri established the Erfan-e Halgheh institute in Tehran, using healing con

Esquipulas II Brought Peace To Central America

Esquipulas back then :  It was  25 years  ago on August 7th when the presidents of Central America got together to sign the "Procedimiento para establecer la paz firme y duradera en Centroamérica", better known as Acuerdo Esquipulas II (Esquipulas II Agreement), in Guatemala.  The five Central American presidents to sign the agreement on that day were: Oscar Arias of  Costa Rica ; Vinicio Cerezo, Guatemala; Daniel ortega, Nicaragua; Napoleón Duarte, El Salvador and José Azcona, Honduras (the latter two now deceased). The agreement laid the  foundation for  the end of the fighting in Central America, which was compounded by he ideological and military interference of the Soviet Union and the United States, competing superpowers in the context of  the Cold War .  Oscar Arias received the Nobel Peace Prize (1987) for his role in getting the agreement signed and bringing peace to the  region . With the so-called Esquipulas II Agreement, each country of the region began

Executing juveniles is strictly prohibited by international law

In the past month, Amnesty issued several updates on juvenile offenders, who were about to face the gallows. Because of that, names like Salar Shadizadi, Saman Naseem, Alireza Shahi or Milad Azimi might all sound familiar to you – unfortunately. There have been some good news and some bad news, as well. As of the good, the execution of Salar Shadizadi has been postponed. This is to allow the murder victim’s family to pardon him. However, Salar remains at risk. The authorities should grant him a fair retrial, making sure that there will not be a recourse to the death penalty. As of the bad news: sadly, Alireza Shahi , a 25-year-old man was executed in the morning of 24 November 2015.  By now, Saman Naseem has become a person, whose fate we have been following closely. In this year’s Write for Rights campaign, you might already have signed a card for him or you might do so with your local group within the next days. Amnesty International is asking the Iranian regime to grant