Skip to main content

Retired professor imprisoned for his peaceful political activism

Since the presidency of Ahmadinejad, students and academics have been targeted for their political activism, engagement in peaceful protests or for exercising their right to freedom of expression. In the aftermath of the 2009 election, the authorities sought to tighten their grip over the universities even more. Professors have been fired or forcibly retired; many academics have been persecuted for attending conferences abroad, having connections to other academics in their field or being linked to reformist political groups.

Retired professor seen as enemy because of his party affiliation 

The latter seems to be the trigger for the imprisonment of the retired chemistry professor, Mohammad Hossein Rafiee Fanood (Hossein Rafiee). He was arrested without a warrant by Ministry of Intelligence officials in mid-June and later transferred to the Evin Prison. So, why exactly is he serving a prison sentence for his peaceful political activism? Because of his “membership of an illegal group”: he was a member of the banned political party, Melli Mazhabi (National Religious Alliance).

Hossein Rafiee pursued a PhD in Physical Chemistry of Polymers of the Imperial College London and taught at the University of Tehran. Besides the banned political party, Melli Mazhabi, he is a member of the National Peace Council, founded by Nobel Peace Laureate Dr Shirin Ebadi.

It's risky to support the nuclear deal 

Professor Rafiee is the author of several books and articles, among them, a comprehensive analysis of the nuclear situation titled “The Geneva agreement.” He sent it to Iranian authorities and published it on his website. A summary was also published in one of Iran’s independent journals. This analysis underpinned his support for President Rouhani’s diplomatic approach to resolving the 
nuclear problem. But Rafiee’s writing wasn’t welcomed by the authorities, he soon faced pressure and constant threats to his person from the Intelligence Agency. In June 2014, he was arrested and accused of “spreading propaganda against the regime.” Despite being released on heavy bail and banned from leaving the country, his subsequent trial was held in secret and he was sentenced to a lengthy prison term.


His document on the nuclear deal not only contained assessment of the agreement, he also restated his position that a sustainable future for the country would only be achieved through the release of political prisoners, free and fair elections and an improvement of the human rights situation in Iran. This part might have contributed to his imprisonment, which, knowing the Iranian authorities, unfortunately doesn’t surprise us.

As Professor Rafiee formulated in his letter written to President Rouhani answering the President’s call for the support of academics for the deal and question “[..] why academics are silent and don’t step forward to publicly support the Geneva agreement,” he wrote on 1 July 2014.

“Because a ministry under your management, the Intelligence Ministry, threatens and arrests your supporters.”

>>TAKE ACTION! for the retired professor and former student of the Imperial College London by using the call for Urgent Action and the attached draft letter.

You can also read his daughter’s saddening full article in the Guardian here.

Popular posts from this blog

Is it worth icing the "candyman"?

There is nothing new about the Islamic Republic ranking second for number of executions , after China. But the fact that the official number almost reached 300 (to be precise: 289) in 2014 is harsh.  It is also obvious that this number and the statistics shown in previous years are certainly below reality, since there are no publicly available data on capital punishment carried out in the country. Reliable sources informed Amnesty International that the figure might be even bigger than 740. According to some ethical principles, all, but only guilty people deserve to be punished, and of course, in proportion to the severity of their crime .  And what does the international law say about the death penalty? It calls on states to guarantee that “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life .”   The law also provides that “In countries which have not abolished the death ...

How should Cameroon fight Boko Haram?

The Cameroonian security forces don't take into account how many lives they sacrifice when it comes to eradicating the Islamist group, Boko Haram. Amnesty International revealed in its new report that t he military offensive against Boko Haram has resulted in widespread human rights violations against civilians in the Far North region of the country. During search-and-cordon operations, security forces  often arrest people on the basis of very little information or assumptions and sometimes they detain whole groups. In February 2015 for example,  in Kossa,  32 men were arrested based on accusations that the village was providing food to Boko Haram. Most were later released, but one man died in custody. After being arrested, people are far too often held incommunicado at illegal detention sites in military bases, before being transferred to the official prisons. And, as Amnesty International learnt, in secret detention, torture is not a rare method to encoura...

The ideology of Boko Haram and the Islamic State

Boko Haram had announced the group's pledge of allegiance to the Islamic State on 7 March 2015, therewith aligning itself with the IS in the global Jihadist movement. The IS welcomed the news and promptly accepted a pledge of allegiance to the group , according to an audiotape purportedly from its spokesman. "We announce to you to the good news of the expansion of the caliphate to West Africa because the caliph... has accepted the allegiance of our brothers [..]”  – IS spokesman Mohammed al-Adnani said in the message. However, this video appearing on IS-affiliated websites could not be authenticated. Although the nature of exact links between the two armed groups are still unclear, it can be confirmed that their ideologies and operations show similarities, despite some remaining differences. (Source: www.dw.com) The ideology of the two armed groups The ideology of both groups is based on a premodern theological tradition that wants the establishment o...