Skip to main content

Is sharing a joke enough reason to jail someone?


Fomusoh Ivo Feh, human rights violations, Africa, Cameroon


Fomusoh Ivo Feh, a 29-year old Cameroonian student was about to start university when he was arrested by six plain-clothes men in the South-West region of Cameroon on 13 December 2014.

His arrest followed a sarcastic SMS message that he sent to a friend, Azah Levis Gob who also shared it with his friend, Afuh Nivelle Nfor, a secondary-school student.

The SMS was sent as a joke about how difficult it is getting into university or finding a good job without being highly qualified in Cameroon – suggesting it was easier to get into Boko Haram. The message read: ‘Boko Haram recruits young people from 14 years-old and above. Conditions for recruitment: 4 subjects at GCE, plus religion.’

After a teacher saw the message on Afuh Nivelle Nfor’s phone and showed it to the police, Ivo and his friends were arrested in late 2014. Subsequently, all three were charged with several offences, including attempting to organise a rebellion.

A military court in Yaoundé sentenced Ivo and his two friends, Afuh Nivelle Nfor and Azah Levis Gob to 10 years in prison for “crimes” related to terrorism on 2 November 2016.



>> TAKE ACTION: Please send messages to the Cameroonian President Paul Biya, urging him to immediately and unconditionally release Fomusoh Ivo Feh and his two friends, Afuh Nivelle Nfor and Azah Levis Gob.

Please find some suggested tweets below that you could use.

.@PR_Paul_Biya, is sharing a joke enough reason to jail someone? I don’t think so. #FreeTheSMS3 #ProtectOurRights


.@PR_Paul_Biya, stopping #BokoHaram and protecting free speech go together. No one should be imprisoned for a joke #FreeTheSMS3 #ProtectOurRights


.@PR_Paul_Biya, no one should be imprisoned for joking. Free Ivo & ensure rights are respected in #Cameroon #ProtectOurRights



Background to the case:


New anti-terrorism law is used to limit freedom of expression


In 2014, Boko Haram, the Nigerian armed group that opposes secular authority, intensified the scale and frequency of its attacks in Cameroon, disrupting the lives of hundreds of thousands of people. In response to that, the Cameroonian government had strengthened the security forces in the Far North region with the aim of protecting the civilian population from Boko Haram’s brutal attacks.

In December 2014, Cameroon passed a new law on repression of terrorism. This bill uses broad definitions of terrorist acts, such as “disrupt the normal functioning of public services, the delivery of essential services to the public or create a crisis situation among the public”. Amnesty International and other human rights organisations, opposition parties and civil society actors have denounced the law as a tool for curtailing civil and political rights. They have also anticipated that the government could easily make use of the anti-terror law to silence its opponents and critics. Considering the already limited freedom of expression and assembly, and the repressive practices of the administration and security forces, the anti-terror law is a real threat of further restricting rights and freedoms guaranteed by international law and the country’s constitution.

With the protection of the law, Cameroonian security forces have committed serious human rights abuses, such as arbitrary arrests, unlawful killings and destruction of property. Other violations include death in custody and enforced disappearances, as in case of the #The130Disappeared men and boys during a cordon and search operation in the villages of Magdeme and Doublé on 27 December 2014.

Cameroon must acknowledge human rights abuses by its security forces


Cameroon authorities have so far failed to acknowledge these human rights abuses and investigate any reliable allegations of crimes. They must ensure that suspects are only arrested if there is a reasonable suspicion that they may have committed a crime and that evidence is appropriately gathered. If there are insufficient grounds for arrest, people must be immediately released. Furthermore, the authorities must ensure that detainees are promptly brought before an independent civilian court that upholds international fair-trial standards, they are informed of the charges against them and have access to a lawyer allowing them to challenge the legality of their detention.

Popular posts from this blog

Is it worth icing the "candyman"?

There is nothing new about the Islamic Republic ranking second for number of executions , after China. But the fact that the official number almost reached 300 (to be precise: 289) in 2014 is harsh.  It is also obvious that this number and the statistics shown in previous years are certainly below reality, since there are no publicly available data on capital punishment carried out in the country. Reliable sources informed Amnesty International that the figure might be even bigger than 740. According to some ethical principles, all, but only guilty people deserve to be punished, and of course, in proportion to the severity of their crime .  And what does the international law say about the death penalty? It calls on states to guarantee that “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life .”   The law also provides that “In countries which have not abolished the death ...

How should Cameroon fight Boko Haram?

The Cameroonian security forces don't take into account how many lives they sacrifice when it comes to eradicating the Islamist group, Boko Haram. Amnesty International revealed in its new report that t he military offensive against Boko Haram has resulted in widespread human rights violations against civilians in the Far North region of the country. During search-and-cordon operations, security forces  often arrest people on the basis of very little information or assumptions and sometimes they detain whole groups. In February 2015 for example,  in Kossa,  32 men were arrested based on accusations that the village was providing food to Boko Haram. Most were later released, but one man died in custody. After being arrested, people are far too often held incommunicado at illegal detention sites in military bases, before being transferred to the official prisons. And, as Amnesty International learnt, in secret detention, torture is not a rare method to encoura...

The ideology of Boko Haram and the Islamic State

Boko Haram had announced the group's pledge of allegiance to the Islamic State on 7 March 2015, therewith aligning itself with the IS in the global Jihadist movement. The IS welcomed the news and promptly accepted a pledge of allegiance to the group , according to an audiotape purportedly from its spokesman. "We announce to you to the good news of the expansion of the caliphate to West Africa because the caliph... has accepted the allegiance of our brothers [..]”  – IS spokesman Mohammed al-Adnani said in the message. However, this video appearing on IS-affiliated websites could not be authenticated. Although the nature of exact links between the two armed groups are still unclear, it can be confirmed that their ideologies and operations show similarities, despite some remaining differences. (Source: www.dw.com) The ideology of the two armed groups The ideology of both groups is based on a premodern theological tradition that wants the establishment o...