Skip to main content

Is sharing a joke enough reason to jail someone?


Fomusoh Ivo Feh, human rights violations, Africa, Cameroon


Fomusoh Ivo Feh, a 29-year old Cameroonian student was about to start university when he was arrested by six plain-clothes men in the South-West region of Cameroon on 13 December 2014.

His arrest followed a sarcastic SMS message that he sent to a friend, Azah Levis Gob who also shared it with his friend, Afuh Nivelle Nfor, a secondary-school student.

The SMS was sent as a joke about how difficult it is getting into university or finding a good job without being highly qualified in Cameroon – suggesting it was easier to get into Boko Haram. The message read: ‘Boko Haram recruits young people from 14 years-old and above. Conditions for recruitment: 4 subjects at GCE, plus religion.’

After a teacher saw the message on Afuh Nivelle Nfor’s phone and showed it to the police, Ivo and his friends were arrested in late 2014. Subsequently, all three were charged with several offences, including attempting to organise a rebellion.

A military court in Yaoundé sentenced Ivo and his two friends, Afuh Nivelle Nfor and Azah Levis Gob to 10 years in prison for “crimes” related to terrorism on 2 November 2016.



>> TAKE ACTION: Please send messages to the Cameroonian President Paul Biya, urging him to immediately and unconditionally release Fomusoh Ivo Feh and his two friends, Afuh Nivelle Nfor and Azah Levis Gob.

Please find some suggested tweets below that you could use.

.@PR_Paul_Biya, is sharing a joke enough reason to jail someone? I don’t think so. #FreeTheSMS3 #ProtectOurRights


.@PR_Paul_Biya, stopping #BokoHaram and protecting free speech go together. No one should be imprisoned for a joke #FreeTheSMS3 #ProtectOurRights


.@PR_Paul_Biya, no one should be imprisoned for joking. Free Ivo & ensure rights are respected in #Cameroon #ProtectOurRights



Background to the case:


New anti-terrorism law is used to limit freedom of expression


In 2014, Boko Haram, the Nigerian armed group that opposes secular authority, intensified the scale and frequency of its attacks in Cameroon, disrupting the lives of hundreds of thousands of people. In response to that, the Cameroonian government had strengthened the security forces in the Far North region with the aim of protecting the civilian population from Boko Haram’s brutal attacks.

In December 2014, Cameroon passed a new law on repression of terrorism. This bill uses broad definitions of terrorist acts, such as “disrupt the normal functioning of public services, the delivery of essential services to the public or create a crisis situation among the public”. Amnesty International and other human rights organisations, opposition parties and civil society actors have denounced the law as a tool for curtailing civil and political rights. They have also anticipated that the government could easily make use of the anti-terror law to silence its opponents and critics. Considering the already limited freedom of expression and assembly, and the repressive practices of the administration and security forces, the anti-terror law is a real threat of further restricting rights and freedoms guaranteed by international law and the country’s constitution.

With the protection of the law, Cameroonian security forces have committed serious human rights abuses, such as arbitrary arrests, unlawful killings and destruction of property. Other violations include death in custody and enforced disappearances, as in case of the #The130Disappeared men and boys during a cordon and search operation in the villages of Magdeme and Doublé on 27 December 2014.

Cameroon must acknowledge human rights abuses by its security forces


Cameroon authorities have so far failed to acknowledge these human rights abuses and investigate any reliable allegations of crimes. They must ensure that suspects are only arrested if there is a reasonable suspicion that they may have committed a crime and that evidence is appropriately gathered. If there are insufficient grounds for arrest, people must be immediately released. Furthermore, the authorities must ensure that detainees are promptly brought before an independent civilian court that upholds international fair-trial standards, they are informed of the charges against them and have access to a lawyer allowing them to challenge the legality of their detention.

Popular posts from this blog

Updated version: Mohammad Ali Taheri ENDED his hunger strike says his family

Mohammad Ali Taheri, the founder of a new spiritual group Erfan-e Halgheh, was on hunger strike for about 70 days. He was protesting his death sentence for “spreading corruption on earth” through his spiritual beliefs and teachings. Furthermore, he has risen up against the Iranian authorities’ refusal to allow him access to his lawyers and to get a copy of the court verdict. On 21 October, his family confirmed that Taheri ended his hunger strike . (Source: amnesty.org ) Taheri he has not been able to meet his legal representative since 22 August, a few days after the lawyer submitted an appeal against the death sentence. While waiting for any information about the status of the appeal, Taheri’s physical health is deteriorating. He has lost weight and is suffering from low blood pressure. He was taken to the prison clinic for a few hours on 18 September after he lost consciousness. Mohammad Ali Taheri established the Erfan-e Halgheh institute in Tehran, using healing con

Esquipulas II Brought Peace To Central America

Esquipulas back then :  It was  25 years  ago on August 7th when the presidents of Central America got together to sign the "Procedimiento para establecer la paz firme y duradera en Centroamérica", better known as Acuerdo Esquipulas II (Esquipulas II Agreement), in Guatemala.  The five Central American presidents to sign the agreement on that day were: Oscar Arias of  Costa Rica ; Vinicio Cerezo, Guatemala; Daniel ortega, Nicaragua; Napoleón Duarte, El Salvador and José Azcona, Honduras (the latter two now deceased). The agreement laid the  foundation for  the end of the fighting in Central America, which was compounded by he ideological and military interference of the Soviet Union and the United States, competing superpowers in the context of  the Cold War .  Oscar Arias received the Nobel Peace Prize (1987) for his role in getting the agreement signed and bringing peace to the  region . With the so-called Esquipulas II Agreement, each country of the region began

Executing juveniles is strictly prohibited by international law

In the past month, Amnesty issued several updates on juvenile offenders, who were about to face the gallows. Because of that, names like Salar Shadizadi, Saman Naseem, Alireza Shahi or Milad Azimi might all sound familiar to you – unfortunately. There have been some good news and some bad news, as well. As of the good, the execution of Salar Shadizadi has been postponed. This is to allow the murder victim’s family to pardon him. However, Salar remains at risk. The authorities should grant him a fair retrial, making sure that there will not be a recourse to the death penalty. As of the bad news: sadly, Alireza Shahi , a 25-year-old man was executed in the morning of 24 November 2015.  By now, Saman Naseem has become a person, whose fate we have been following closely. In this year’s Write for Rights campaign, you might already have signed a card for him or you might do so with your local group within the next days. Amnesty International is asking the Iranian regime to grant