Skip to main content

Is it worth icing the "candyman"?

There is nothing new about the Islamic Republic ranking second for number of executions, after China. But the fact that the official number almost reached 300 (to be precise: 289) in 2014 is harsh. 
It is also obvious that this number and the statistics shown in previous years are certainly below reality, since there are no publicly available data on capital punishment carried out in the country. Reliable sources informed Amnesty International that the figure might be even bigger than 740.

And what does the international law say about the death penalty? It calls on states to guarantee that “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.” 
 The law also provides that “In countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes in accordance with the law in force at the time of the commission of the crime [..].”

The United Nations General Assembly stressed the aforementioned paragraph from 1966, by voting on a moratorium on death penalty in 2007, and again in December 2012 with the vast majority of the states in favour. 

But still, the Iranian authorities executes numerous prisoners for 'non serious' crimes - such as 'insulting the prophet', 'enmity against God', being a member of an armed opposition group or for drugs offences. Credible sources generally conclude that executions for drug offences constitute more than three quarters of the total number of executions in Iran. 

Drug trafficking represents a major challenge for the Islamic Republic of Iran. Due to the country’s geographical location and, particularly, its vulnerable border with Afghanistan and Pakistan, it has become a major transit country for illicit drugs. Afghanistan is the world's largest illicit opium producer; above 70% of Afghan opiates are trafficked via Iran and Pakistan every year to East and South-East Asia and to Europe, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Reports also show that the country has one of the most serious drug addiction problems in the world.

In response to these challenges, over the years, Iran has established one of the strongest counter-narcotics enforcement capabilities in the region. An effective instrument to radically combat drug consumption and drug trafficking is the capital punishment, sometimes cited by the Iranian authorities. However, it has been documented that the growing number of executions for alleged drug offences in recent years hasn’t entailed a decrease in drug trafficking or drug use.

John Ryan, the CEO of drug research and advocacy organisation Pennington Institute, says "The scale of people who get caught drug trafficking and the scale of the drug market proves most people think they will get away with it and are prepared to play Russian roulette.” 

Popular posts from this blog

How should Cameroon fight Boko Haram?

The Cameroonian security forces don't take into account how many lives they sacrifice when it comes to eradicating the Islamist group, Boko Haram. Amnesty International revealed in its new report that t he military offensive against Boko Haram has resulted in widespread human rights violations against civilians in the Far North region of the country. During search-and-cordon operations, security forces  often arrest people on the basis of very little information or assumptions and sometimes they detain whole groups. In February 2015 for example,  in Kossa,  32 men were arrested based on accusations that the village was providing food to Boko Haram. Most were later released, but one man died in custody. After being arrested, people are far too often held incommunicado at illegal detention sites in military bases, before being transferred to the official prisons. And, as Amnesty International learnt, in secret detention, torture is not a rare method to encoura...

The ideology of Boko Haram and the Islamic State

Boko Haram had announced the group's pledge of allegiance to the Islamic State on 7 March 2015, therewith aligning itself with the IS in the global Jihadist movement. The IS welcomed the news and promptly accepted a pledge of allegiance to the group , according to an audiotape purportedly from its spokesman. "We announce to you to the good news of the expansion of the caliphate to West Africa because the caliph... has accepted the allegiance of our brothers [..]”  – IS spokesman Mohammed al-Adnani said in the message. However, this video appearing on IS-affiliated websites could not be authenticated. Although the nature of exact links between the two armed groups are still unclear, it can be confirmed that their ideologies and operations show similarities, despite some remaining differences. (Source: www.dw.com) The ideology of the two armed groups The ideology of both groups is based on a premodern theological tradition that wants the establishment o...