Skip to main content

Reporting on the situation on the field


Co-operating with the Iranian authorities to guarantee basic human rights to all is not an easy job.
The Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Dr Ahmed Shaheed has experienced it very often. Since the creation of the mandate (in 2011) by the United Nations Human Rights Council, Dr Shaheed hasn’t been allowed to visit the country and undertake field research and make reports with the locals. Although many countries called on Iran to co-operate with the United Nations Special Procedures, and follow up on the requests of visits of Special Rapporteurs, the country still continues to refuse any kind of partnership or support. 

(Source: shaheedoniran.org)
 Therefore, Dr Shaheed has followed the evolution of human rights in Iran with the help of his Special Rapporteur colleagues and other sources and means. This was also the case in relation to his latest report, released in early March. As he highlights, “information for the present report was gathered during a fact-finding mission to Germany, Norway and Denmark, during which 39 interviews were conducted with victims and activists within the Iranian diaspora.” More than hundred, further interviews were conducted with people in Iran, by telephone and video-conferencing. As Dr Shaheed explains, he also “reviewed information contained in open letters, confidential communications; news reports and broadcasts produced by domestic media outlets in the country; official statements [..]” and so on.

In the report, Dr Shaheed recognises a number of efforts by the Iranian government to implement the 2010 UPR commitments, but regrets that a majority of them remained outstanding. Beside describing his findings, the Special Rapporteur elaborates several recommendations. Amongst other things, he recommends that:

“Authorities should immediately nullify the death sentences against all political prisoners and prisoners of conscience [..] and others, whose alleged actions do not constitute a serious crime under international law.”
“The Government should amend laws and policies, and reconsider draft legislation that infringes on the right to freely associate and assemble with expressive groups or like-minded individuals, or to promote peaceful ideals and activities.”
He also “calls on the Government to amend laws that violate the rights of women, or that undermine their full enjoyment of civil, political, social, and economic rights, including the right to work and to freedom from discrimination, especially in education and at the workplace.”

Not surprisingly, the report was not welcome among Iranian officials. The Spokeswoman of Iran's Foreign Ministry described the report by the UN Special Rapporteur as “unfair and unscientific”, saying that the report is politically-motivated. She noted that, “The issue of human right should be viewed quite technically, and our country’s progress and realities should be seriously noticed.”
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Is it worth icing the "candyman"?

There is nothing new about the Islamic Republic ranking second for number of executions , after China. But the fact that the official number almost reached 300 (to be precise: 289) in 2014 is harsh.  It is also obvious that this number and the statistics shown in previous years are certainly below reality, since there are no publicly available data on capital punishment carried out in the country. Reliable sources informed Amnesty International that the figure might be even bigger than 740. According to some ethical principles, all, but only guilty people deserve to be punished, and of course, in proportion to the severity of their crime .  And what does the international law say about the death penalty? It calls on states to guarantee that “Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life .”   The law also provides that “In countries which have not abolished the death ...
Read more

How should Cameroon fight Boko Haram?

The Cameroonian security forces don't take into account how many lives they sacrifice when it comes to eradicating the Islamist group, Boko Haram. Amnesty International revealed in its new report that t he military offensive against Boko Haram has resulted in widespread human rights violations against civilians in the Far North region of the country. During search-and-cordon operations, security forces  often arrest people on the basis of very little information or assumptions and sometimes they detain whole groups. In February 2015 for example,  in Kossa,  32 men were arrested based on accusations that the village was providing food to Boko Haram. Most were later released, but one man died in custody. After being arrested, people are far too often held incommunicado at illegal detention sites in military bases, before being transferred to the official prisons. And, as Amnesty International learnt, in secret detention, torture is not a rare method to encoura...
Read more

The ideology of Boko Haram and the Islamic State

Boko Haram had announced the group's pledge of allegiance to the Islamic State on 7 March 2015, therewith aligning itself with the IS in the global Jihadist movement. The IS welcomed the news and promptly accepted a pledge of allegiance to the group , according to an audiotape purportedly from its spokesman. "We announce to you to the good news of the expansion of the caliphate to West Africa because the caliph... has accepted the allegiance of our brothers [..]”  – IS spokesman Mohammed al-Adnani said in the message. However, this video appearing on IS-affiliated websites could not be authenticated. Although the nature of exact links between the two armed groups are still unclear, it can be confirmed that their ideologies and operations show similarities, despite some remaining differences. (Source: www.dw.com) The ideology of the two armed groups The ideology of both groups is based on a premodern theological tradition that wants the establishment o...
Read more